Compulsory Licensing of Technology and the Essential Facilities Doctrine
Reiko Aoki and
No 167, Discussion Paper from Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University
We consider compulsory licensing of intellectual property as a remedy for anticompetitive practices. We identify aspects of intellectual property that could warrant a different remedy from those developed for access to physical essential facilities. Based on the analysis, we present a characterisation of optimal compulsory licensing for a simple market. We find that royalty payments offer a greater range of choices to a regulator than fixed fees. Thus, even though the marginal cost of supplying access to intellectual property is zero, some unit charging is likely to be efficient.
Keywords: essential facilities; intellectual property; access price; royalty; investment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K2 L4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Compulsory licensing of technology and the essential facilities doctrine (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hit:piedp1:167
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Paper from Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Digital Resources Section, Hitotsubashi University Library ().