Equity and Aggregation in Environmental Valuation

Michael Ahlheim and Ulrike Lehr

No 295/2008, Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim from Department of Economics, University of Hohenheim, Germany

Abstract: Environmental valuation studies aim at the assessment of the social benefits or the social costs caused by some change in environmental quality (in the broadest sense). The most popular field of application of environmental valuation studies is project appraisal where the benefits arising from some environmental project (measured in terms of people's willingness to pay for that project) are assessed and confronted with the costs of the project or with the benefits from some alternative project if a choice has to be made between different projects. A closer look at the results of empirical valuation studies shows that in many surveys a negative correlation between the number auf household members and the willingness to pay (WTP) stated by a household for a project can be observed. These results are rather puzzling because in larger households more people are going to benefit from an environmental improvement than in small households. A plausible explanation for these results is that household budgets are tighter for large households than for smaller households with the same household income. Therefore, large households must state a smaller WTP for a project than smaller households with the same income and the same preferences. This might have consequences for the allocation of public funds in all cases where the realization of a specific environmental project depends on the absolute value of the aggregate social benefits it generates. In order to calculate the social benefits typically the WTPs of the different households affected by that project are added up. In this aggregation process the members of larger households have a lower weight and, therefore, their WTP has a smaller impact on the decision if a certain project is realized or not. The reason for this violation of the principle of horizontal equity is that for the computation of the social benefits not individual but household WTPs are aggregated. In this paper we suggest to use household equivalence scales for the evaluation of WTP data in order to reduce this discrimination of the members of large families. We demonstrate the effects of equivalence scales on the results of environmental valuation surveys using an empirical study carried out in Eastern Germany.

Keywords: contingent valuation; Environmental Valuation; Equity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 D63 H43 Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17 pages
Date: 2008-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-dcm, nep-env and nep-ppm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.uni-hohenheim.de/RePEc/hoh/papers/295.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.uni-hohenheim.de/RePEc/hoh/papers/295.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.uni-hohenheim.de/RePEc/hoh/papers/295.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://projekte.uni-hohenheim.de/RePEc/hoh/papers/295.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hoh:hohdip:295

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim from Department of Economics, University of Hohenheim, Germany Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ulrike Berberich ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).