Equity in Health Care Funding: Comparison of Expenditures in Ontario to Allocations Based on Population Need

Brian Hutchison (), Vicki Torrance-Rynard, Jeremiah Hurley, Stephen Birch (), John Eyles () and Stephen Walter ()
Additional contact information
Brian Hutchison: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
Vicki Torrance-Rynard: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University
Stephen Birch: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University
John Eyles: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Geography, McMaster University
Stephen Walter: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University

No 2003-03, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series from Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Abstract: Background - The geographic distribution of health care funding in Canada has traditionally been based on past allocations and the distribution of health care facilities and providers. Whether this approach has succeeded in distributing resources among populations in keeping with relative health care needs is unknown. Methods - Using data on self-assessed health status and utilization of health care services from the Ontario Health Survey, data on health care expenditures from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, and population data from Statistics Canada, we compared actual health care expenditures for geographically-defined populations in Ontario to allocations based on relative population need as represented by age, sex and self-assessed health status. Comparisons were made at the regional (Health Region), district (District Health Council) and local (Public Health Unit) levels. Results - Expenditures and needs-based allocations were significantly different for 4 of 7 regions, 9 of 15 districts and 23 of 42 local areas. At the regional level, needs-based allocations ranged from 8.9% higher to 6.4% lower than actual expenditures. For districts, needs-based allocations ranged from 12.9% higher to 9.8% lower than expenditures. At the local level, needs-based allocations ranged from 23.8% higher to 18.8% lower than expenditures. Intraclass correlation coefficients measuring agreement between needs-based per capita expenditures and actual per capita expenditures were 0.86, 0.74 and 0.58 for regions, districts and local areas respectively. Interpretation - Although, on average, the differences between needs-based allocations and actual health care expenditures were not large, the discrepancies were substantial for many geographic areas. The adoption in Ontario of funding methods based on relative population needs would improve equity in the allocation of health care resources to populations and result in a considerable redistribution of resources.

Keywords: Health care funding; health care resource allocation; Ontario; Needs-based funding; Equity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 26 pages
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.chepa.org/Files/Working%20Papers/03-03.pdf First version, 2003 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hpa:wpaper:200303

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series from Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lyn Sauberli ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).