Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?

Alberto Alesina, Edward Ludwig Glaeser and Bruce Sacerdote ()

Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics

Abstract: European countries are much more generous to the poor relative to the US level of generosity. Economic models suggest that redistribution is a function of the variance and skewness of the pre-tax income distribution, the volatility of income (perhaps because of trade shocks), the social costs of taxation and the expected income mobility of the median voter. None of these factors appear to explain the differences between the US and Europe. Instead, the differences appear to be the result of racial heterogeneity in the US and American political institutions. Racial animosity in the US makes redistribution to the poor, who are disproportionately black, unappealing to many voters. American political institutions limited the growth of a socialist party, and more generally limited the political power of the poor.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (119)

Published in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/12502088/1209137.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State? (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:12502088

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().