Deferred Acceptance Algorithms: History, Theory, Practice, and Open Questions
Alvin Roth
Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics
Abstract:
The deferred acceptance algorithm proposed by Gale and Shapley (1962) has had a profound influence on market design, both directly, by being adapted into practical matching mechanisms, and, indirectly, by raising new theoretical questions. Deferred acceptance algorithms are at the basis of a number of labor market clearinghouses around the world, and have recently been implemented in school choice systems in Boston and New York City. In addition, the study of markets that have failed in ways that can be fixed with centralized mechanisms has led to a deeper understanding of some of the tasks a marketplace needs to accomplish to perform well. In particular, marketplaces work well when they provide thickness to the market, help it deal with the congestion that thickness can bring, and make it safe for participants to act effectively on their preferences. Centralized clearinghouses organized around the deferred acceptance algorithm can have these properties, and this has sometimes allowed failed markets to be reorganized.
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (161)
Published in International Journal of Game Theory
Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/2579651 ... red%20Acceptance.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Deferred acceptance algorithms: history, theory, practice, and open questions (2008) 
Working Paper: Deferred Acceptance Algorithms: History, Theory, Practice, and Open Questions (2007) 
Working Paper: Deferred Acceptance Algorithms: History, Theory, Practice, and Open Questions (2007) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:2579651
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().