Is the Melting Pot Still Hot? Explaining the Resurgence of Immigrant Segregation

Jacob Vigdor, Edward Glaeser and David Cutler

Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper uses decennial Census data to examine trends in immigrant segregation in the United States between 1910 and 2000. Immigrant segregation declined in the first half of the century, but has been rising over the past few decades. Analysis of restricted access 1990 Census microdata suggests that this rise would be even more striking if the native-born children of immigrants could be consistently excluded from the analysis. We analyze longitudinal variation in immigrant segregation, as well as housing price patterns across metropolitan areas, to test four hypotheses of immigrant segregation. Immigration itself has surged in recent decades, but the tendency for newly arrived immigrants to be younger and of lower socioeconomic status explains very little of the recent rise in immigrant segregation. We also find little evidence of increased nativism in the housing market. Evidence instead points to changes in urban form, manifested in particular as native-driven suburbanization and the decline of public transit as a transportation mode, as a central explanation for the new immigrant segregation.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (92)

Published in Review of Economics and Statistics

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/2664275/cutler_meltingpot1.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Is the Melting Pot Still Hot? Explaining the Resurgence of Immigrant Segregation (2008)
Working Paper: Is the Melting Pot Still Hot? Explaining the Resurgence of Immigrant Segregation (2005)
Working Paper: Is the Melting Pot Still Hot? Explaining the Resurgence of Immigrant Segregation (2005)
Working Paper: Is the Melting Pot Still Hot? Explaining the Resurgence of Immigrant Segregation (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:2664275

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().