Enrollee Mix, Treatment Intensity, and Cost in Competing Indemnity and HMO Plans

Daniel Altman, David Cutler and Richard Zeckhauser

Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics

Abstract: Why do indemnity insurance plans cost substantially more per capita—77% more in our study—than HMOs? We answer this question using data from a large organization’s insurance pool, covering 215,000 lives. We decompose cost differences for eight major medical conditions into four sources: demographics, incidence within demographic groups, treatment intensity, and prices per service. Greater incidence of disease in the indemnity plan (both from demographics themselves and within demographic groups) and higher prices each explain nearly 50% of the difference. Contrary to conventional wisdom, indemnity plans do not have greater treatment intensity.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Published in Journal of Health Economics

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/2664300/cutler_enrolleemix.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Enrollee mix, treatment intensity, and cost in competing indemnity and HMO plans (2003)
Working Paper: Enrollee Mix, Treatment Intensity, and Cost in Competing Indemnity and HMO Plans (2000)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:2664300

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().