Does Competition Destroy Ethical Behavior?

Andrei Shleifer

Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics

Abstract: Explanations of unethical behavior often neglect the role of competition, as opposed to greed, in assuring its spread. Using the examples of child labor, corruption, "excessive" executive pay, corporate earnings manipulation, and commercial activities by universities, this paper clarifies the role of competition in promoting censured conduct. When unethical behavior cuts costs, competition drives down prices and entrepreneurs' incomes, and thereby reduces their willingness to pay for ethical conduct. Nonetheless, I suggest that competition might be good for ethical behavior in the long run, because it promotes growth and raises incomes. Higher incomes raise the willingness to pay for ethical behavior, but may also change what people believe to be ethical for the better.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (273)

Published in American Economic Review

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/27867243/w10269.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Does Competition Destroy Ethical Behavior? (2004)
Working Paper: Does Competition Destroy Ethical Behavior? (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:27867243

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().