Does the Minimum Legal Drinking Age Save Lives?

Jeffrey Miron () and Elina Tetelbaum

Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics

Abstract: The minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) is widely believed to save lives by reducing traffic fatalities among underage drivers. Further, the Federal Uniform Drinking Age Act, which pressured all states to adopt an MLDA of 21, is regarded as having contributed enormously to this life-saving effect. This article challenges both claims. State-level panel data for the past 30 yr show that any nationwide impact of the MLDA is driven by states that increased their MLDA prior to any inducement from the federal government. Even in early-adopting states, the impact of the MLDA did not persist much past the year of adoption. The MLDA appears to have only a minor impact on teen drinking. (JEL H11, K42).

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Published in Economic Inquiry

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4319664/Miron_MinDrinkingAge.doc (application/msword)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4319664/Miron_MinDrinkAgeLives.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: DOES THE MINIMUM LEGAL DRINKING AGE SAVE LIVES? (2009)
Working Paper: Does the Minimum Legal Drinking Age Save Lives? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:4319664

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().