Religion, Social Networks, and Life Satisfaction

Chaeyoon Lim and Robert David Putnam

Scholarly Articles from Harvard Kennedy School of Government

Abstract: Although the positive association between religiosity and life satisfaction is well documented, much theoretical and empirical controversy surrounds the question of how religion actually shapes life satisfaction. Using a new panel dataset, this study offers strong evidence for social and participatory mechanisms shaping religion’s impact on life satisfaction. Our findings suggest that religious people are more satisfied with their lives because they regularly attend religious services and build social networks in their congregations. The effect of within-congregation friendship is contingent, however, on the presence of a strong religious identity. We find little evidence that other private or subjective aspects of religiosity affect life satisfaction independent of attendance and congregational friendship.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (142)

Published in American Sociological Review

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/1110553 ... %20Life%20Satisf.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not found (http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/11105537/2010%20Putnam,%20Lim%20ASR%20Religion,%20Soc%20Networks,%20and%20Life%20Satisf.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/11105537/2010%20Putnam,%20Lim%20ASR%20Religion,%20Soc%20Networks,%20and%20Life%20Satisf.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:hksfac:11105537

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().