EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does short-term training activate means-tested unemployment benefit recipients in Germany?

Joachim Wolff and Eva Jozwiak
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Eva Kopf

No 200729, IAB-Discussion Paper from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany]

Abstract: "This paper estimates for a sample of means-tested unemployment benefit recipients the effects of their participation in short-term training programmes in Germany. We apply propensity score matching and rely on a large sample of treated and controls from administrative data, which in contrast to data used in many comparable evaluation studies is rich in terms of information on household members. We regard a period after the beginning of the year 2005 just after a reform of the means-tested benefit system, which aimed at activating employable people in needy households. Short-term training programmes intensively target such persons. We study whether the programme has an impact on the 'regular employment' rate of the treated. Moreover, we also quantify whether it reduces their job-seeker rate and their rate of unemployment benefit II receipt. We estimated effects for within company and classroom training separately and find that mainly the former programme that establishes a contact to an employer has a considerable impact on the regular employment rate of the participants. The impacts on the other outcome variables are usually weaker. Our analysis considers effect heterogeneity. We generally distinguish between men and women in East and West Germany. But we also regard effect heterogeneity by age, migration background, qualification, unemployment rate, family status/children and time since last job. Both programmes tend to be less effective in particular for people aged younger than 25 years than for others. This may reflect that the programmes are also a tool to avoid that young adults are registered as unemployed for longer than three months." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Keywords: Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Ostdeutschland; Westdeutschland; Auswirkungen; Bedarfsgemeinschaft; berufliche Reintegration; Beschäftigungseffekte; Erfolgskontrolle; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Hartz-Reform; IAB-Bewerberangebotsdatei; Integrierte Erwerbsbiografien; Lernort Betrieb; Lernort Schule; regionaler Vergleich; arbeitslose Frauen; arbeitslose Männer; Trainingsmaßnahme; Arbeitslosengeld II-Empfänger; Arbeitslosigkeitsdauer; arbeitsmarktpolitische Maßnahme; 2005-2007 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C13 H43 J68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 64 pages
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (38)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doku.iab.de/discussionpapers/2007/dp2907.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iab:iabdpa:200729

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IAB-Discussion Paper from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany] Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek (iab.wib@iab.de).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:iab:iabdpa:200729