EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Can Algorithms Reliably Predict Long-Term Unemployment in Times of Crisis? – Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Max Kunaschk () and Julia Lang ()
Additional contact information
Max Kunaschk: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany ; University of Groningen
Julia Lang: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany ; Univ. Regensburg

No 202208, IAB-Discussion Paper from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany]

Abstract: "In this paper, we compare two popular statistical learning techniques, logistic regression and random forest, with respect to their ability to classify jobseekers by their likelihood to become long-term unemployed. We study the performance of the two methods before the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the impact of the pandemic and its associated containment measures on their prediction performance. Our results show that random forest consistently out-performs logistic regression in terms of prediction performance, both, before and after the beginning of the pandemic. During the lockdowns of the first wave, the number of unemployment entries and the fraction of individuals that become long-term unemployed strongly increases, and the prediction performance of both methods declines. Finally, while the composition of the (long-term) unemployed changed at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, we do not find systematic patterns across groups with different levels of labor market attachment or across different sectors of previous employment in terms of declines in prediction performance." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Keywords: Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Pandemie; IAB-Open-Access-Publikation; Beschäftigungseffekte; Arbeitslosigkeitsentwicklung; Integrierte Erwerbsbiografien; Algorithmus; Langzeitarbeitslosigkeit; Prognosegenauigkeit; Prognoseverfahren; Regressionsanalyse; Arbeitsmarktprognose; 2011-2021 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2022-05-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-big and nep-lab
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.48720/IAB.DP.2208

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iab:iabdpa:202208

DOI: 10.48720/IAB.DP.2208

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IAB-Discussion Paper from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany] Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek ().

 
Page updated 2022-12-25
Handle: RePEc:iab:iabdpa:202208