Living Wage Benchmark Report: Baja Carlifornia, Mexico (January 2021)

Marcelo Delajara (), Rocío Espinosa, Claudia Fonseca, Martha Anker () and Richard Anker ()
Additional contact information
Marcelo Delajara: Anker Research Institute
Rocío Espinosa: Espinosa Yglesias Research Centre (CEEY)
Martha Anker: Anker Research Institute
Richard Anker: Anker Research Institute

No 21-01-01, Global Living Wage Coalition (GLWC) from Universidad Privada Boliviana

Abstract: We present estimates of the living wage in the municipalities of Ensenada and San Quintín, which are located in the center and south of Baja California, México. Economic activity in these municipalities is concentrated in agriculture and fishing, and to a much lesser extent in industry. The poverty rates are considerably higher than average for Baja California, but somewhat lower than average for Mexico. In the calculation, we used the Anker and Anker (2017) methodology and data from both primary and secondary sources. We obtained food prices and housing costs directly through a price survey in the two areas studied. We inferred the costs of goods and services other than food and housing from secondary data sources. These secondary data sources, mainly household income and expenditure surveys, do not distinguish between municipalities, but do distinguish between urban and rural areas. The fact that Ensenada is predominantly urban and San Quintín rural and small towns, allowed us to obtain estimates of these costs for each municipality. We show that the living wage in the municipality of Ensenada is MXN 15,929 (US$ 800) per month, which consists of take-home pay of MXN 13,539 (US$ 680) and MXN 2,389 (US$ 120) in income tax and social security. For San Quintín, the living wage is MXN 15,009 (US$ 754) per month consisting of take-home pay of MXN 12,835 (US$ 645) with MXN 2,174 (US$ 109) in social security contribution and income tax. Although these values are similar with only a 5.5% difference between them, we recommend using the living wage that corresponds to each jurisdiction. However, for those companies that have workers in both municipalities and that consider it impractical to have, or cannot pay, two different living wages, we recommend using the higher estimate to ensure that the wage is sufficient to accommodate all workers in the study area.

Keywords: Living wage; Anker methodology; decent work; Baja California; Mexico. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D10 J13 J22 J30 J80 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 50 pages
Date: 2021-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.globallivingwage.org/wp-content/upload ... ali-LW-Benchmark.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iad:glliwa:210101

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Global Living Wage Coalition (GLWC) from Universidad Privada Boliviana Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ricardo Nogales C. ().