Economics at your fingertips  

Are Patent Offices Substitutes ?

Elise Petit, Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie and Lluís Gimeno Fabra

No 2021-049, iCite Working Papers from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles

Abstract: This paper evaluates whether and to what extent patent offices can substitute for each other. Based on an original dataset comprising 7.200 PCT patents filed simultaneously in Japan, the USA and Europe, the empirical analysis confirms that the degree of substitution is significant. Patent offices search up to 37% less technology classes, generate up to 33% less citations, and send up to 43% less communications when a PCT application was previously processed by another office. They also rely more on international citations and provide more information in the early stage of the examination process. Further substitution may still be leveraged, as around 55% of technology classes searched and up to 70% of backward citations are duplicates -voluntarily or not - of prior examination work.

Keywords: Patent systems; TRIPs; national bias; examination; international comparison (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 29 p.
Date: 2021-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ino and nep-isf
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Published by:

Downloads: (external link) ... RGHE_GIMENOFABRA.pdf Œuvre complète ou partie de l'œuvre (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Are Patent Offices Substitutes? (2021) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from ...

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in iCite Working Papers from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benoit Pauwels ().

Page updated 2023-03-26
Handle: RePEc:ict:wpaper:2013/330845