The Delicate Balance of Special Autonomy Agreements: Lessons from Indonesia and the Philippines

Sarah Shair-Rosenfield

No WP2607, IDEAGOV Working Papers from IDEAGOV - International Center for Decentralization and Governance

Abstract: Does asymmetric decentralization fulfil the twin promise of regional self-governance within a peaceful nation-state? Despite the obvious appeal of pacifying restive regions with distinct authority while keeping them as parts of the larger country, the theoretical promise of asymmetric decentralization often goes unfulfilled in reality. This is especially true where regional grievances were sufficient to lead to deadly civil conflict, and where those grievances include especially high levels of (perceived) economic exploitation and extreme poverty in the region compared to the rest of the nation. Comparison between the special status regions of Aceh and Papua (in Indonesia) and the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao and unsuccessful Cordillera Administrative Region (in the Philippines) highlights the importance of limiting veto players in agreeing on the design of special autonomy to resolving regional claim-making and mitigating regional economic deprivation. The comparative analysis suggests why special autonomy arrangements often fail to achieve the critical balance of solving existing regional grievances and preventing resumption of conflict and unrest.

Keywords: asymmetric decentralization; regional self-governance; conflict resolution; economic inequality; Indonesia; the Philippines (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
Date: 2026-02-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ideagov.eu/RePEc/ida/wpaper/WP2607.pdf First version, 2026 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ida:wpaper:wp2607

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IDEAGOV Working Papers from IDEAGOV - International Center for Decentralization and Governance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IDEAGOV - International Center for Decentralization and Governance ().