EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes: The Case of Uruguay

Mario Bergara, Andres Pereyra (), Juan Andrés Moraes, Daniel Chasquetti, Daniel Buquet, Adolfo Garcé and Rubén Tansini

No 3200, Research Department Publications from Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department

Abstract: Uruguay generates a variety of policy outcomes. First, there are relatively stable policies, such as those allowing for the commercial and financial openness of the country. Then there are inflexible and low-quality policies, such as those related to social policies, some areas of state reform (civil servants wages and hiring mechanisms), the bankruptcy regime, etc. Finally, there are volatile outcomes resulting from economic shocks, such as those related to discretionary public spending. In the cases in which historical precedence or the availability of external enforcement devices do not lead to relatively stable policies, the main outer feature of Uruguayan policies is rigidity. The source of rigidity appears to be a mixture of institutional factors (multiple veto points, factionalized parties and direct democracy mechanisms) and political conflict (divergent policy preferences), in which it is very costly to move from the status quo due to the credible threat of policy reversal. Political institutions in Uruguay are conducive to achieving political compromise in the short run, but cannot effectively cooperate in establishing stable and flexible policies in the long run. The difficulty in achieving intertemporal political exchanges is consistent with the main characteristics of the political environment: a large number of key political actors and veto points, a relevant amount of unobservable political maneuvering, poor enforcement technologies in the economic arena, a politically influenced bureaucracy, political exchanges occurring outside the legislative arena, a particular constellation of parties and preferences and costly policymaking and institutional changes.

Date: 2006-03
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.iadb.org/research/pub_hits.cfm?pub_id=R ... le_name=pubR-510.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.iadb.org/research/pub_hits.cfm?pub_id=R-510&pub_file_name=pubR-510.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.iadb.org/research/pub_hits.cfm?pub_id=R-510&pub_file_name=pubR-510.pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes: The Case of Uruguay (2006) Downloads
Working Paper: Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes and Policy Outcomes: The Case of Uruguay (2005) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:idb:wpaper:3200

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Department Publications from Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Felipe Herrera Library ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:idb:wpaper:3200