Noblesse Oblige? Moral Identity and Prosocial Behavior in the Face of Selfishness
Roberta Dessi and
No 750, IDEI Working Papers from Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse
What makes individuals conform or diverge after observing prosocial or selfish behavior by others? We study experimentally how social comparison (observing a peer’s behavior) interacts with identity motives for cooperation. Participants play two games. We increase the strength of the identity motive by inducing subjects in a treatment condition to infer their identity from behavior in the first game. Cooperators who observe a peer defect donate 28% more to their unknown partner in the second game in the treatment than in the control group. Our results are consistent with the predictions of Bénabou and Tirole (2011), and show that the "suckerto- saint effect" identified by Jordan and Monin (2008) can have important behavioral consequences.
JEL-codes: A1 A12 D1 D3 D64 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://idei.fr/sites/default/files/medias/doc/wp/2012/wp_idei_750.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Noblesse Oblige? Moral Identity and Prosocial Behavior in the Face of Selfishness (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ide:wpaper:26502
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IDEI Working Papers from Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().