Sharing the blame? Local electoral accountability and centralized school finance in California
No 2009/33, Working Papers from Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB)
While electoral accountability should be stronger when responsibilities are clearly assigned to one political office, the involvement of higher tiers of government is often associated with policies specifically designed to improve local accountability. This paper investigates the impact of centralization on local electoral accountability in the context of California’s school finance system. Results show that voters are responsive to differences in dropout rates and pupil-teacher ratios, and that incumbents are less likely to be reelected when a district’s degree of centralization is high. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 appears to have sharpened local electoral accountability.
Keywords: centralization; accountability; school finance; local elections; shared responsibility; No Child Left Behind (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 H75 H77 I2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39 pages
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Sharing the Blame? Local Electoral Accountability and Centralized School Finance in California (2013)
Working Paper: Sharing the Blame? Local Electoral Accountability and Centralized School Finance in California (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ieb:wpaper:doc2009-33
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().