Social Welfare, Priority to the Worst-Off And the Dimensions of Individual Well-Being

Marc Fleurbaey

No 312, IDEP Working Papers from Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France

Abstract: When well-being is one-dimensional, the key ethical issue for the definition of social welfare is the degree of inequality aversion, which can be discussed with variants of the Pigou-Dalton transfer principle. When it is measured in terms of primary goods, functionings or capabilities, individual well-being is fundamentally multi-dimensional. It is then important to take account of individual preferences over the different dimensions. This has interesting consequences for the definition of social welfare. This chapter shows how the axiomatic techniques of social choice can then be used to justify particular social welfare functions and derive suitable criteria for the assessment of reforms of the Welfare State and consequences of globalization.

Pages: 51 pages
Date: 2003-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.idep-fr.org/IMG/document/dt/dt0312.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
Working Paper: Social welfare, priority to the worst-off and the dimensions of individual well-being (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iep:wpidep:0312

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IDEP Working Papers from Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gregory Cornu ().