This study aims to provide new evidence linking internal corporate governance mechanisms and corporate misconduct, using a sample of 2,844 public US companies during the period 2007-2019. The results reveal that optimal size and diverse boards, including well-functioning audit com- mittees, are negatively related to corporate violations. In contrast, we show that board mem- bers’ independence, activity, and ownership are positively related to a rm’s fraudulent activities. Therefore, not all internal governance mechanisms are related to lower corporate misconduct. Moreover, we show that some internal governance mechanisms, such as the share of female board members, mitigate only certain types of corporate misconduct. The results show that attempts to regulate corporate governance mechanisms should be considered with caution as they do not always provide the expected outcome
Oskar Kowalewski (),
Nicolas Eugster and
Piotr Spiewanowski ()
Additional contact information
Piotr Spiewanowski: Institute of Economics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
No 2022-ACF-05, Working Papers from IESEG School of Management
Keywords: : corporate misconduct; internal governance mechanisms; board of directors; committees; ownership (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G01 G34 G38 K22 L51 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 46
Date: 2022-08
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ieseg.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/2022-ACF-05.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ies:wpaper:f202205
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from IESEG School of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lies BOUTEN ().