An Open Mind Wants More: Opinion Strength and the Desire for Genetically Modified Food Labeling Policy

Sonja Radas and Mario Teisl ()

No 702, Working Papers from The Institute of Economics, Zagreb

Abstract: There are two opposing viewpoints regarding consumers' acceptance of genetically modified (GM) foods and their desire for the labeling of these foods. Some suggest consumers are unconcerned and do not desire any GM labeling while others indicate the opposite. The mixed results may be because consumers are capable of making finer distinctions than surveys have called for, and appear to have evaluation schemes that are quite sensitive to information about the potential benefits and risks associated with GM foods. Using a mix of statistical approaches, we find consumers are quite different and nuanced in terms of their preferences for GM labeling policy. Consumers with less-defined views require mandatory labeling of the most stringent type and require the most amount of information to be placed on labels. In contrast, consumers with stronger viewpoints (either pro- or con-GM) are more relaxed in their labeling and information requirements.

Keywords: labeling policy; cluster analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M31 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17 pages
Date: 2007-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/106592 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iez:wpaper:0702

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from The Institute of Economics, Zagreb Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Doris Banicevic ().