Are two cheap, noisy measures better than one expensive, accurate one?

Martin Browning and Thomas Crossley (tfcross@umich.edu)

No W09/01, IFS Working Papers from Institute for Fiscal Studies

Abstract:

1. Survey responses are always subject to measurement error. In general surveys (and especially longitudinal surveys), there are severe constraints on the time that can be spent eliciting a less noisy response for any target variable. In this paper we consider when it may be better to consider multiple noisy measures of the target measure rather than improving the reliability of a single measure.

2. The Kotlarski result states that if the measurement errors in two measures of the same

target variable are mutually independent and independent of the true value then we can recover the entire distribution of the quantity of interest, up to location.

3. We consider designing surveys to deliver measurement error with desirable properties. This shifts the emphasis from reliability (the signal to noise ratio for any given measure) to the joint properties of the multiple measures.

4. To illustrate our ideas, we consider a concrete example: the measurement of consumption inequality. A small simulation study suggests that the approach we propose has promise. The next step in this research agenda is experiments in survey data collection.

Date: 2009-01-19
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (28)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp0901.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp0901.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp0901.pdf [302 Found]--> https://ifs.org.uk/wps/wp0901.pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Are Two Cheap, Noisy Measures Better Than One Expensive, Accurate One? (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:09/01

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE
mailbox@ifs.org.uk

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IFS Working Papers from Institute for Fiscal Studies The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emma Hyman (emma_h@ifs.org.uk).