Housing assets and savings behaviour among the elderly in Great Britain

Richard Disney (), Thomas Gallagher and Andrew Henley
Additional contact information
Richard Disney: Institute for Fiscal Studies and University of Sussex
Thomas Gallagher: Institute for Fiscal Studies

No W95/22, IFS Working Papers from Institute for Fiscal Studies

Abstract: The modern life cycle theory of consumption predicts dissaving of assets during retirement. But evidence suggests that dissaving occurs at a relatively slow rate, so that many households bequeath assets. Evidence from the Retirement Survey in Britain suggests that the portfolio of bequeathable assets changes subsequent to retirement: typically home owners run down their financial assets while the value of the housing stock is maintained for a long period. This may reflect a desire to bequest the house, or a precautionary motive for holding a housing asset against catastrophic risks to consumption (for example the need for specialised and expensive health and nursing care). Holding on to a substantial housing stock may incur significant recurrent (maintenance) costs. Moreover the existence of significant (housing) assets long into retirement may not signify a bequest motive as such but rather the presence of transactions costs and the absence of well-functioning equity release schemes. The observed financial asset dissaving may then result in part from 'excess' ownership of housing stocks. The study, using the 1988-89 Retirement Survey in Britain: (i) estimates expenditure on housing relative to income for the sample aged 55-69, (ii) simulates optimal housing/consumption allocations for a simple life cycle model and (iii) examines the relationship between 'excess' holdings of housing, financial dissaving and other portfolio behaviour subsequent to retirement. It shows that households with large housing budget shares tend to run down financial assets more rapidly, and that net equity release from downsizing housing assets is typically used up in consumption over a short period. This might suggest a welfare case for widening and improving the market for schemes which permit incremental equity release (such as reverse annuity mortgages).

Date: 1995-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ifs.org.uk (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:95/22

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IFS Working Papers from Institute for Fiscal Studies The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emma Hyman ().