NAFTA Renegotiation: US Offensive and Defensive Interests vis-à-vis Canada
Gary Hufbauer and
Euijin Jung ()
Additional contact information
Euijin Jung: Peterson Institute for International Economics
No PB17-22, Policy Briefs from Peterson Institute for International Economics
Abstract:
Previous US administrations—whether Republican or Democrat—have focused on reducing barriers to trade and investment during trade negotiations, but the Trump administration will prioritize reducing the US trade deficit when it renegotiates the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Trump will seek to lower Canadian barriers to US exports and oppose changes that would lower US barriers to Canadian exports. The authors identify well-known US and Canadian trade barriers and speculate on possible “blockbuster” demands that the Trump trade team might make on Canada in keeping with Trump’s concept of unfair trade (e.g., border tax adjustment, rules of origin, and currency undervaluation). NAFTA renegotiation gives the Trump administration an opportunity to resolve longstanding trade grievances with Canada, provided the United States makes its own concessions. Both countries can benefit from updating NAFTA to address issues not foreseen in the early 1990s, such as digital commerce and state-owned enterprises. But US insistence on “blockbuster” demands could put not only the talks but also the entire relationship between Ottawa and Washington at risk.
Date: 2017-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/na ... rests-vis-vis-canada (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb17-22
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Policy Briefs from Peterson Institute for International Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peterson Institute webmaster ().