Axiomatic Analysis of Choosing The Second Best

Somdeb Lahiri

No WP2000-05-04, IIMA Working Papers from Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department

Abstract: The dominant theme in decision theory has been the one where an agent chooses what is perceived to be the best outcome out of a (finite) set of outcomes. This has been the model that economic theory has traditionally favored. In a paper by Baigent and Gaertner (1996) we find a departure from this theme. It is argued there that if there is a unique best outcome then often one may forgo one’s claim to it out of politeness. A similar consideration is that of altruism which manifests itself in similar behavior. However, can there be no other type of consideration which prompts one to judiciously avoid the best? In this paper we provide two axiomatic characterizations of the decision rule which invariably selects the second best alternative. Unlike Baigent and Gaertner (1996) we restrict ourselves to the situation where no two alternatives share the same rank.

Date: 2000-05-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01681

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IIMA Working Papers from Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().