Tracking can be more equitable than mixing: Peer effects and college attendance

Marisa Hidalgo-Hidalgo

No 162, Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality

Abstract: Parents and policy makers often wonder whether, and how, the choice between a tracked or a mixed educational system affects the efficiency and equity of national educational outcomes. This paper analyzes this question taking into account their impact on educational results at later stages and two main results are found. First, it shows that tracking can be the efficient system in societies where the opportunity cost of college attendance is high or the pre-school achievement distribution is very dispersed. Second, this paper shows that tracking is the most equitable system for students with intermediate levels of human capital required to attend college.

Keywords: Peer Effects; Tracking; Mixing; College attendance gap (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 I28 J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
Date: 2010
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-lab and nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2010-162.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Tracking can be more equitable than mixing: peer effects and college attendance (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2010-162

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Maria Ana Lugo ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).