Economics at your fingertips  

Is inequality of opportunity robust to the measurement approach?

Xavi Ramos () and Dirk Van de gaer ()
Additional contact information
Dirk Van de gaer: Ghent University

Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Dirk Van de gaer

No 450, Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality

Abstract: Recent literature has suggested many ways of measuring equality of opportunity. We analyze in a systematic manner the various approaches put forth in the literature to show whether and to what extent different choices matter empirically. We use EU-SILC data for most European countries for 2005 and 2011. The choice between ex-ante and ex-post approaches is crucial and has a substantial influence on inequality of opportunity country orderings. Growth regressions also illustrate the relevance of conceptual choices. We only find significant negative effects for some direct parametric ex-ante measures.

Keywords: Equality of opportunity; measurement; ex-ante; ex-post; direct approach; indirect approach; responsibility; effort; income; EU-SILC. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D3 D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eur and nep-ltv
Date: 2017-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Is Inequality of Opportunity Robust to the Measurement Approach? (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Maria Ana Lugo ().

Page updated 2019-10-11
Handle: RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2017-450