Two classical decompositions of the Gini index by income sources: interpretation of contribution terms
Ivica Urban
No 618, Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality
Abstract:
Natural Gini decomposition (Rao, V. M., 1969, J R Stat Soc Ser A, 132:418–425) and marginal Gini decomposition (Lerman, R. I., and Yitzhaki, S., 1985, Rev Econ Stat 67:151–156) are the most popular and widely used methods to reveal the contributions of various income sources to total income inequality. Their acceptance and highly spread empirical application have persisted in the face of criticism of the former method. This paper aims to “liberate†the natural Gini decomposition from two major critiques: that the method should be abolished because a uniformly distributed income source obtains zero contribution and that contribution terms lack a meaningful interpretation. Regarding the latter critique, it is shown that the contribution of a certain income source expresses inequality reduction due to the replacement of this source by a marginal uniformly distributed counterfactual income. Concerning the former critique, the argument is as follows: natural Gini decomposition belongs to the absolute inequality view, which commands that equal additions of income leave inequality unchanged. In this sense, it is perfectly normal that the natural Gini decomposition obtains zero contribution of the uniformly distributed income.
Keywords: decomposition; income inequality; income sources; Gini index (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D31 D33 D63 H22 H23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 35 pages
Date: 2022-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2022-618.pdf First version, 2022 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2022-618
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Maria Ana Lugo ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).