Parent-Offspring Conflict over Mate Choice: An Experimental Investigation Using a Chinese Marriage Market
Jeanne Bovet,
Eva Raiber,
Weiwei Ren,
Charlotte Wang () and
Paul Seabright
No 2018-005, Working Papers from Department of Research, Ipag Business School
Abstract:
Both parents and offspring have evolved mating preferences that enable them to select 10 mates and in-laws to maximize their inclusive fitness. Although such preferences may substantially overlap, the theory of parent-offspring conflict predicts that preferences for potential mates may differ between parents and their offspring, especially with respect to the importance of investment potential and the biological quality of a mate. Indeed, individuals are expected to value biological quality more in their mates than in their in-laws, and to value investment potential more in their in-laws than in their mates. We tested this hypothesis in China using a naturalistic ?marriage market? where parents actively search for marital partners for their offspring. Parents gather at a public park in order to advertise the characteristics of their adult children, looking for a potential son or daughter-in-law. To experimentally investigate parent-offspring conflict in mating preferences, we presented 832 parents and young adults from the city of Kunming (Yunnan, China) with hypothetical mating candidates varying in their levels of income (as a proxy for investment potential) and physical attractiveness (as a proxy for biological quality). Consistent with parent-offspring conflict theory, we found a significant difference between preferences of young women and parents, with the former evaluating physical attractiveness as more important than parents. We also found a strong effect of the sex of the mating candidate on preferences, as physical attractiveness was deemed more valuable in a female potential mate or in-law, thus underlining the specific role of female physical appearance in the evolution of mate choice.
Keywords: mate choice; in-law preferences; parent-offspring conflict; trade-offs; attractiveness; sex differences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2018-01-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://faculty-research.ipag.edu/wp-content/uploa ... IPAG_WP_2018_005.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ipg:wpaper:2018-005
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Department of Research, Ipag Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ingmar Schumacher ().