EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bargaining and Conflict with Up-front Investments: How Power Asymmetries Matter

Zachary Schaller () and Stergios Skaperdas
Additional contact information
Zachary Schaller: Department of Economics, University of California-Irvine

No 181909, Working Papers from University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics

Abstract: We examine settings—such as litigation, labor relations, or arming and war -- in which players first make non-contractible up-front investments to improve their bargaining position and gain advantage for possible future conflict. Bargaining is efficient ex post, but we show that a player may prefer Conflict ex ante if there are sufficient asymmetries in strength. There are two sources of this finding. First, up-front investments are more dissimilar between players under Con- flict, and they are lower than under Bargaining when one player is much stronger than the other. Second, the probability of the stronger player winning in Conflict is higher than the share received under Nash bargaining. We thus provide a rationale for conflict to occur under complete information that does not depend on long-term commitment problems. Greater balance in institutional support for different sides is more likely to maintain peace and settlements.

Keywords: Power asymmetries; War; Litigation; Contests (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 D74 J53 K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 27 pages
Date: 2019-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cta, nep-gth, nep-lab, nep-law and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.economics.uci.edu/research/wp/1819/18-19-09.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Bargaining and conflict with up-front investments: How power asymmetries matter (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: Bargaining and Conflict with Up-Front Investments: How Power Asymmetries Matter (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:irv:wpaper:181909

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Melissa Valdez ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:irv:wpaper:181909