Toxoplasma Gondii Levels in Swine Operations: Differences Due to Technology Choice and Impacts on Costs of Production

Vina Diderrich, James Kliebenstein, S. Patton, Jeffrey Zimmerman, Arne Hallam (ahallam@iastate.edu), Eric Bush, Charles Faulkner and Raymond McCord

Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: Human toxoplasmosis is an infection that has multiple sources: consumption of pork and lamb, water, and handling cat litter and garden soil. While some are, many are not related to livestock production methods. Therefore, there are weak market signals to farmers to change pig production systems, even when there are clear data indicating that pig confinement systems significantly lower the probability of pork being contaminated with the parasite, Toxoplasma gondii. We investigated cost differences for pig production systems. While confinement buildings are more expensive, these costs are offset by the greater feed and bedding costs in non-confinement production. There is a "slight cost advantage" of $0.31 per hundred weight for pigs produced in a confinement system.

Date: 2002-03-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Food Control, March 2002, vol. 13 no. 2, pp. 103-106

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genres:10111

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Curtis Balmer (econwebmaster@iastate.edu).