To Punt or Not to Punt

Brent Kreider ()

Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: On Dec. 10, 1995, the Philadelphia Eagles beat the Dallas Cowboys 20-17 in overtime after the Cowboys twice failed near the end of regulation to convert on a fourth down play in their own territory. Coach Switzer's decision not to punt was roundly vilified in the national sports media as "irrational," "amateurish," "dumb and dumber," and one of the "worst decisions made in the annals of time" comparable to "The Edsel. The leisure suit. Adam biting on the apple." The analysis in this article shows that far from being one of the worst decisions in the annals of time, Switzer's decision most likely maximized his team's chances of winning the game, even in the extreme case that a failed fourth down conversion would mean certain defeat.

Date: 1996-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in UMAP Journal of Undergraduate Mathematics and Its Applications, Winter 1996, vol. 4 no. 17

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genres:10232

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Curtis Balmer ().