Comparison of Analytical Approaches for Hedging Agricultural Commoditites

Marvin L. Hayenga, Harvey Witt and Ted Schroeder

Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: There is little disagreement in the literature that hedging can be an effective risk management tool for agricultural firms. However, when placing a hedge the hedger must determine the futures position to take to offset the price risk on his current or anticipated cash position. When direct hedges are placed (e.g., corn cash position hedged in corn futures) the hedged quantity to cash quantity ratio, or hedge ratio, is often assumed to be 1. However, in instances involving cross hedging (hedging a cash commodity in a different but related futures market) the hedge ratio may deviate significantly from 1 because the prices of the two comodities may not change 1 for 1. Therefore, the hedge ratio should be empirically estimated. Disagreements arise on the best procedure to estimate minimum risk hedge ratio; namely, whether to use cash and future price levels, price changes, or percentage price changes in the estimation process.

Date: 1987-04-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Futures Markets, April 1987, vol. 3 no. 1, pp. 135-146

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genres:11309

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Curtis Balmer ().