Reexamining Rural Decline: How Changing Rural Classifications Affect Perceived Growth

Georgeanne Artz and Peter Orazem

Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: This article illustrates the commonly overlooked sample selection problem inherent in using rural classification methods that change over time due to population changes. Since fast growing rural areas grow out of their rural status, using recent rural definitions excludes the most successful places from the analysis. Average economic performance of the areas remaining rural significantly understates true rural performance. We illustrate this problem using one rural classification system, rural-urban continuum codes. Choice of code vintage alters conclusions regarding the relative speed of rural and urban growth and can mislead researchers regarding magnitudes and signs of factors believed to influence growth.

Date: 2005-01-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr and nep-geo
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Review of Regional Studies, Fall 2006, vol. 36, pp. 163-191

Downloads: (external link)
http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/papers/paper_12224_05001.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Reexamining Rural Decline: How Changing Rural Classifications Affect Perceived Growth (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genres:12224

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Curtis Balmer ().