The Paradox of Interest Rates of the Greenback Era: A Reexamination
Oleksandr Zhylyevskyy ()
Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics
The two leading explanations for the counterintuitive behavior of interest rates during the Greenback Era (1862â€“1878) â€“ the resumption expectations model of Calomiris (1988) and the capital flow argument of Friedman and Schwartz (1963) â€“ are inconsistent with each other in terms of their treatment of financial arbitrage. A methodology to identify unexploited arbitrage opportunities in financial data is proposed. Observable returns strongly suggest that the money market of the Greenback Era did not systematically admit arbitrage, except possibly around the times of the Gold Corner of 1869 and the Panic of 1873, which implies that Calomiris provides a more plausible explanation.
Keywords: Greenback Era; money market; arbitrage opportunity; interest rate paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: N21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mon
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Journal of Monetary Economics, November 2010, vol. 57 no. 8, pp. 1026-1037
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: The paradox of interest rates of the Greenback Era: A reexamination (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genres:32050
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Curtis Balmer ().