EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A critique of two methods for assessing the nutrient adequacy of diets

Helen Jensen, Sarah M. Nusser, Howard Riddick and Laura Sands

ISU General Staff Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: The adequacy of diets can be assessed using several analytical approaches. This paper reviews two methods of assessment: a cutoff method, which estimates the percentage of the population having usual intakes below a given value; and a probability method, which assesses the percentage of the population whose usual intakes are below their individual requirements. First, the concept of usual nutrient intakes and the problems associated with estimating usual intake distributions are discussed. Next, the two methods of dietary assessment and their related assumptions are described and compared. The more specific inference of the probability method is shown to rely on its assumptions and data that are currently not available. While the cutoff method is simpler, its use may result in misclassification errors and its estimates are highly influenced by the cut-off standard selected.

Date: 1992-05-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstre ... fc63aaf1432a/content
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
Working Paper: Critique of Two Methods for Assessing the Nutrient Adequacy of Diets (1992) Downloads
Working Paper: Critique of Two Methods for Assessing the Nutrient Adequacy of Diets, A (1991) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genstf:199205010700001012

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ISU General Staff Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Curtis Balmer ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199205010700001012