Why do rural firms live longer?

Li Yu, Peter Orazem and Robert W. Jolly

ISU General Staff Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: For the first 13 years after entry, the hazard rate for firm exits is persistently higher for urban than rural firms. While differences in observed industry market, local market and firm attributes explain some of the rural-urban gap in firm survival, rural firms retain a survival advantage 25% greater than observationally equivalent urban firms. In competitive markets, the remaining survival advantage for rural firms must be attributable to unobserved factors that are known at the time of entry. One plausible candidate for such a factor is thinner markets for the capital of failed rural firms. The implied lower salvage value of rural firms suggests that firms sorting into rural markets must have a higher probability of success in order to leave their expected profits equal to what they could earn in an urban market.

Date: 2009-07-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstre ... e190f718b282/content
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
Working Paper: Why Do Rural Firms Live Longer? (2011)
Journal Article: Why Do Rural Firms Live Longer? (2010)
Working Paper: Why Do Rural Firms Live Longer? (2009)
Working Paper: Why Do Rural Firms Live Longer? (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genstf:200907030700001086

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ISU General Staff Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Curtis Balmer ().