Brand Inertia in Seed Demand: State Dependence and Heterogeneity

Jinjing Luo, GianCarlo Moschini and Edward D. Perry

ISU General Staff Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: A commonly observed feature of differentiated product markets is brand inertia, the tendency of consumers to purchase brands they have purchased in the past. In this paper, we develop and estimate a micro-level random coefficients logit model to study two competing explanations of brand inertia, state dependence and heterogeneity, in the U.S. soybean seed industry. Specifically, heterogeneity is captured by brand-specific random coefficients and state dependence is incorporated through a brand purchase history variable. We further deal with two important issues in the identification: we apply a correction to the initial conditions problem similar to the procedure outlined in Wooldridge (2005); and to deal with price endogeneity, we use the control function approach in our nonlinear regression environment. The model is estimated using a large dataset of more than 200,000 seed purchase decisions by roughly 28,000 farmers over the period 1996-2016. We find that state dependence and heterogeneity are both important features of seed demand. On average, farmers are willing to pay (WTP) an additional $6.77/unit for a brand if it was purchased in the previous period, equivalent to about 15% of the average retail price. We also find that farmers are willing to pay large premiums for brand labels and the glyphosate tolerance (GT) technology, however there is considerable heterogeneity in this willingness. To investigate the implications of state dependence, especially as it relates to the introduction and diffusion of the GT innovation, we simulate several counterfactual scenarios (with/without state dependence and/or the GT technology). Our simulations show that state dependence has little effect on the diffusion of the GT technology, but it functions as a cushion for the structural benefits brought about by the innovation—it reduces the gains/losses in brands’ market shares. We also show that there is an “early adoption” advantage associated with the marketing of the GT trait, which is reinforced by state dependence.

Date: 2019-11-26
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstre ... 73675d6f8aaa/content
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genstf:201911260800001091

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ISU General Staff Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Curtis Balmer ().