EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Identifying Barriers for the Implementation and the Operation of Biogas Power Generation Projects in Southeast Asia: An Analysis of Clean Development Mechanism Projects in Thailand

Masachika Suzuki (), Bernardo Kehdy () and Sulabh Jain ()
Additional contact information
Masachika Suzuki: Kansai University, http://www.kansai-u.ac.jp/
Bernardo Kehdy: MBA Program, IMRE (International Management of Resources and Environment)
Sulabh Jain: MBA Program, IMRE (International Management of Resources and Environment)

No EMS_2010_20, Working Papers from Research Institute, International University of Japan

Abstract: Tapioca starch and palm oil industries are considered as ones of the fast-growing agro-industries in Thailand. Both industries release a significant amount of wastewater with high organic content as a result of their production processes. Traditionally, open pond systems have been used to treat wastewater and consequently achieve compliance with environmental standards. Over the last few years however, more sustainable, expensive and modern alternatives have begun to be used to treat wastewater (mainly anaerobic reactors). The start of clean development mechanism (CDM) projects in Thailand has also contributed significantly to this expansion.1 One significant advantage of the anaerobic reactors, over the open ponds, is the possibility of capturing, in a controlled environment, the greenhouse gases (GHGs) generated, principally biogas with a high concentration of methane. The biogas can be used to generate heat and/or produce electricity, substituting fossil fuels as an energy source. The number of biogas utilization projects in Thailand and the Southeast Asia region has been increasing substantially in recent years. While a biogas plant can bring economic benefits with respect to energy self-sufficiency and cost-saving over time, the design and operation of a biogas plant requires high investments and is still perceived as a risky business due to a number of barriers. In addition, actual data from biogas plants indicate that the performance of a biogas plant with respect to the amount of biogas is not as attractive as it was initially expected among the project developers. Even though many literatures show the performance of biogas plants in certain experimental conditions, surprisingly, few literatures have explained or have shown data about the low performance of the biogas plants compared to the expected projected performance or design. The purpose of this study is to identify these barriers in biogas technology implementation and operation in Thailand, and to determine how these barriers lower the performance of the biogas business. The study was conducted based on the analysis of 48 selected CDM projects in Thailand and further analysis through consultation with relevant professionals in CDM and the biogas business in Thailand. The results of this study provide important lessons for future biogas utilization and greenhouse gas emission reductions in the Southeast Asian region.

Keywords: Barriers in project implementation and operation; tapioca starch industry; palm oil industry; biogas in Thailand; Clean Development Mechanism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37 pages
Date: 2010-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.iuj.ac.jp/workingpapers/index.cfm?File=EMS_2010_20.pdf First version, 2010 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iuj:wpaper:ems_2010_20

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Research Institute, International University of Japan 777 Kokusai-cho, Minami Uonuma0-shi, Niigata 949-7277 JAPAN. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kazumi Imai, Office of Academic Affairs ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:iuj:wpaper:ems_2010_20