EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparative Analysis of Litigation Systems: An Auction-Theoretic Approach

Michael Baye, Dan Kovenock and Casper de Vries

No 2004-24, Working Papers from Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy

Abstract: A simple auction-theoretic framework is used to examine symmetric litigation environments where the legal ownership of a disputed asset is unknown by the court. The court observes only the quality of the case presented by each party, and awards the asset to the party presenting the best case. Rational litigants influence the quality of their cases by hiring skillful attorneys. This framework permits us to compare the equilibrium legal expenditures that arise under a continuum of legal systems. The British rule, American rule, and some recently proposed legal reforms are special cases of our model.

Keywords: auctions; contests; litigation; fee-shifting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D8 K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Economic Journal, 2005

Downloads: (external link)
http://kelley.iu.edu/riharbau/RePEc/iuk/wpaper/bep ... kovenock-devries.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Chapter: Comparative Analysis Of Litigation Systems: An Auction-Theoretic Approach (2005)
Journal Article: Comparative Analysis of Litigation Systems: An Auction-Theoretic Approach (2005)
Working Paper: Comparative Analysis of Litigation Systems: An Auction-Theoretic Approach (2000) Downloads
Working Paper: Comparative Analysis of Litigation Systems: an Auction-Theoretic Approach (2000) Downloads
Working Paper: Comparative Analysis of Litigation Systems: An Auction-Theoretic Approach (2000) Downloads
Working Paper: Comparative Analysis of Litigation Systems: An Auction-Theoretic Approach (2000) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iuk:wpaper:2004-24

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Rick Harbaugh ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-27
Handle: RePEc:iuk:wpaper:2004-24