Persuasion in Fundraising Letters: An Interdisciplinary Study

Elizabeth Goering, Ulla Connor, Ed Nagelhout and Richard Steinberg

Working Papers from Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Department of Economics

Abstract: In this paper, we report experimental evidence on the effectiveness of several techniques of persuasion commonly utilized in direct-mail solicitation. The study is built on theory-based, descriptive models of fundraising discourse and on comparisons of recommended and actual practices related to three dimensions of persuasion: rhetorical, visual, and linguistic. The specific rhetorical variable included is persuasive appeal (rational, credibility, or affective). The visual variable selected for the study is the presence or absence of bulleted lists, and the linguistic variable included is readability, or the complexity of exposition. Subjects were presented with pairs of fictive direct-mail appeals from imaginary universities that differ in these dimensions and asked to allocate a hypothetical $100 across each pair. Results suggest that letters utilizing credibility appeals and letters written at a high level of readability produce the highest donations.

Keywords: Persuasion; Donations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
Date: 2008-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.iupui.edu/~econ/workingpapers/wp200804.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iup:wpaper:wp200804

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ye Zhang ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).