The Paradoxical Fate of the Representative Firm

Frank Schohl

Working Paper Series B from Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, School of of Economics and Business Administration

Abstract: While modern theorising on the microfoundation of macroeconomics makes intense use of the representative firm notion, severe objections have been raised. Regarded from the history of thought this is the second time that its usefulness is called into question. The paper presents an old literature which has ended with the abandonment of the representative firm from competition theory because it neglects the innovation issue. It shows that its subsequent adoption to macroeconomics suffers from similar flaws. It follows that the representative firm is inappropriate for the analysis of modern competitive economies and should be withdrawn from macroeconomics as well.

Keywords: microfoundation; representative agent; aggregation; innovation; competition; Marshall; Schumpeter (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B20 D00 E00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998-02-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jen:jenavo:1998-03

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series B from Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, School of of Economics and Business Administration
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Markus Pasche ().