Equilibrium Concepts for Boundedly Rational Behavior in Games
Markus Pasche ()
Working Paper Series B from Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultïät
The paper extends the Nash equilibrium concept to account for arbitrary behavioral heuristics. Players are allowed not only to choose strategies, but also to select behavioral rules how to choose strategies. It is argued that behavioral profiles are in equilibrium if no player can benefit from deviating to another strategy, another behavioral rule or its parametrization. It turns out that in general payoff maximization is not a dominant behavioral rule. Furthermore it is shown that heterogeneous behavior may endogeneously evolve even in case of a unique symmetric Nash equilibrium.
Keywords: Nash equilibrium; behavioral profiles; heterogenity; bounded rationality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 C72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jen:jenavo:2001-03
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper Series B from Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultïät
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().