Indicators in Technology Assessment Passive Choices or Reflected Options?
Nuno Filipe Boavida () and
2016 Papers from Job Market Papers
There is a lack of research on indicators in TA studies. But, there are several reasons supporting the need to address this omission: indicators are cornerstones of many TA studies, revealing the scope and quality of the problem addressed. They are not normatively neutral instruments for analysing problems, but they can frame problems and strategies for the solution of problems. They need to be transparent and thoughtfully selected to open alternatives and prevent unintended controversies; they require substantial reflection because conditions for their use may change significantly, and finally they can provide valid insights for TA about the policy process. Furthermore, this paper offers a heuristic model for analysing knowledge production within TA studies. This is done to improve the analysis of complex problems and structuring options for democratic decision-making. The model proposes a detailed explanation of the complete selection of indicators using transparent criteria and analysing the observables used or the ones which should be used or the ones not yet known. Finally, this paper provides insights into the discussion of the panel organized while addressing the question as to how we can acquire deeper and more comprehensive knowledge leading TA professionals to reflect on options in their studies.
JEL-codes: O33 A14 C4 D8 O14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jmp:jm2016:pbo324
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in 2016 Papers from Job Market Papers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christian Zimmermann ().