Doing good with other people's money: A charitable giving experiment with students in environmental sciences and economics
Fredrik Carlsson,
Mitesh Kataria (),
Elina Lampi and
Maria Levati
No 2010-089, Jena Economics Research Papers from Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
Abstract:
We augment a standard dictator game to investigate how preferences for an environmental project relate to willingness to limit others' choices. We explore this issue by distinguishing three student groups: economists, environmental economists, and environmental social scientists. We find that people are generally disposed to grant freedom of choice, but only within certain limits. In addition, our results are in line with the widely held belief that economists are more selfish than other people. Yet, against the notion of consumer sovereignty, economists are not less likely to restrict others' choices and impose restrictions closer to their own preferences than the other student groups.
Keywords: dictator game; charitable giving; social preferences; paternalism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 D64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-12-15
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-evo, nep-exp, nep-hpe, nep-ltv and nep-soc
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://oweb.b67.uni-jena.de/Papers/jerp2010/wp_2010_089.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Doing good with other people’s money: A charitable giving experiment with students in environmental sciences and economics (2011) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2010-089
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Jena Economics Research Papers from Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Markus Pasche ().