Intragenerational deliberation and intergenerational sustainability dilemma
Raja Timilsina (),
Koji Kotani (),
Yoshinori Nakagawa and
Additional contact information
Yoshinori Nakagawa: School of Economics and Management, Kochi University of Technology
Tatsuyoshi Saijo: Research Institute for Future Design, Kochi University of Technology
No SDES-2019-14, Working Papers from Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management
Many environmental problems have occurred because the current generation affects future generations, but the opposite is not true. This one-way nature induces the current generation to take advantage of resources without considering future generations, which we call â€œintergenerational sustainability dilemma (ISD).â€ While deliberation is known to bring a change in individual opinions and lead to a better decision in some intragenerational problems, little is known about how â€œintragenerational deliberationâ€ affects individual opinions and collective decisions for â€œintergenerational problems such as ISDâ€ in societies. To this end, an ISD game (ISDG) along with interviews and questionnaires are instituted in rural and urban areas of Nepalese societies. In ISDG, a sequence of six generations, each of which consists of three people, is organized, and each generation chooses either to maintain intergenerational sustainability (sustainable option) or to maximize her own generationâ€™s payoff by irreversibly imposing a cost on future generations (unsustainable option) under intragenerational â€œdeliberativeâ€ process. Our result demonstrates that urban subjects have a wider variety of individual initial opinions and support an unsustainable option more often than do rural subjects. It also shows that individual opinions change through deliberation when subjects in a generation do not share the same initial opinion, reflecting that more urban subjects change opinions; such opinion changes are identified not to work in the direction to enhance intergenerational sustainability for the urban generations. Overall, our experiment suggests that a closely-knit society such as rural areas in Nepal is a hope, and intragenerational deliberation neither effectively affect individual opinions for intergeneration sustainability nor resolve ISD.
Keywords: Intergenerational sustainability dilemma; deliberative process; opinion change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 48 pages
Date: 2019-12, Revised 2019-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Published in SDE Series, December 2019, pages 1-48
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.souken.kochi-tech.ac.jp/seido/wp/SDES-2019-14.pdf First version, 2019 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kch:wpaper:sdes-2019-14
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sachiko Minami ().