Ancestral kinship patterns substantially reduce the negative effect of increasing group size on incentives for public goods provision
Hannes Rusch
No 82, Working Paper Series in Economics from University of Cologne, Department of Economics
Abstract:
Phenomena like meat sharing in hunter-gatherers, self-sacrifice in intergroup conflicts, and voluntary contribution to public goods provision in laboratory experiments have led to the development of numerous theories on the evolution of altruistic in-group beneficial behavior in humans. Many of these theories abstract away from the effects of kinship on the incentives for public goods provision, though. Here, it is investigated analytically how genetic relatedness changes the incentive structure of that paradigmatic game which is conventionally used to model and experimentally investigate collective action problems: the linear public goods game. Using recent anthropological data sets on relatedness in 61 contemporary hunter-gatherer and horticulturalist societies the relevant parameters of this model are then estimated. It turns out that the kinship patterns observed in these societies substantially reduce the negative effect of increasing group size on incentives for public goods provision. It is suggested, therefore, that renewed attention should be given to inclusive fitness theory in the context of public goods provision also in sizable groups, because its explanatory power with respect to this central problem in the evolution of human cooperativeness and altruism might have been substantially underrated.
Keywords: public goods; inclusive fitness; altruism; relatedness; kinship (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B15 C72 D64 H41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-05-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ockenfels.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/wiso_fak/ ... _download/wp0082.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kls:series:0082
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper Series in Economics from University of Cologne, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kiryl Khalmetski ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).