Income and Longevity Revisited: Do High-earning Women Live Longer?
Friedrich Breyer and
Jan Marcus
No 2011-13, Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz from Department of Economics, University of Konstanz
Abstract:
The empirical relationship between income and longevity has been addressed by a large number of studies, but most were confined to men. For the first time we analyze a large data set from the German public pension scheme on women who died between 1994 and 2005, employing both non-parametric and parametric methods. We find that the relationship between earnings and life expectancy is similar for women and men: Among women who contributed at least for 25 years, women at the 90th percentile of the income distribution can expect to live 3 years longer than women at the 10th percentile.
Keywords: Life expectancy and income; women; public pensions; Germany (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H55 I12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 27 pages
Date: 2011-05-16
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-age and nep-hea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.uni-konstanz.de/FuF/wiwi/workingpaperse ... yer_Marcus-13-11.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Income and Longevity Revisited: Do High-Earning Women Live Longer? (2010) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:knz:dpteco:1113
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://www.wiwi.uni-konstanz.de/en
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz from Department of Economics, University of Konstanz Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office Ursprung ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).