The Ill-Posed Problem in Growth Empirics
Peter Jensen () and
No 2005-11, CAM Working Papers from University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Applied Microeconometrics
A problem encountered in growth empirics is that the number of explanatory variables is large compared to the number of observations. This makes it impossible to condition on all regressors when determining if a variable is important. We investigate methods used to resolve this problem: Extreme bounds, Sala-i-Martin’s test, BACE, general-to-specific, minimum t-statistics, BIC and AIC. We prove that the problem in general is ill-posed and that the existing methods are inconsistent. We propose a test and apply it to determine if "good policy" increases the effectiveness of foreign aid on growth. The test rejects inference regarding good policy.
Keywords: AIC; BACE; BIC; extreme bounds; general-to-specific; ill-posed inverse problem; robustness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C12 C51 O10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kud:kuieca:2005_11
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CAM Working Papers from University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Applied Microeconometrics ï¿½ster Farimagsgade 5, Building 26, DK-1353 Copenhagen K., Denmark. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Hoffmann ().