Hybrid All-Pay and Winner-Pay Contests

Johan Lagerlof

No 17-20, Discussion Papers from University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics

Abstract: In many contests in economic and political life, both all-pay and winner-pay expenditures matter for winning. This paper studies such hybrid contests under symmetry and asymmetry. The symmetric model is very general but still yields a simple closed-form solution. More contestants tend to lead to substitution toward winner-pay investments, and total expenditures are always lower than in the corresponding all-pay contest. With a biased decision process and two contestants, the favored contestant wins with a higher likelihood, chooses less winner-pay investments, and contributes more to total expenditures. An endogenous bias that maximizes total expenditures disfavors the high-valuation contestant but still makes her the more likely one to win.

Keywords: rent-seeking; lobbying; influence activities; multiple influence channels; producer theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D24 D72 D74 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2017-09-26
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econ.ku.dk/english/research/publications/wp/dp_2017/1720.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Hybrid All-Pay and Winner-Pay Contests (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kud:kuiedp:1720

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics Oester Farimagsgade 5, Building 26, DK-1353 Copenhagen K., Denmark. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Hoffmann ().